Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jafarian v. Cashcall Inc., 2:17-cv-03132-APG-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180124e55 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Moharram Jafarian ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, Sun Loan Company of Nevada, Inc. (erroneously served as Sun Loan Co.), (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: On December 29, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Sun Loans was served with Plaintiff's Complaint on January 2, 2018. Presently, Sun Loans' resp
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Plaintiff, Moharram Jafarian ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, Sun Loan Company of Nevada, Inc. (erroneously served as Sun Loan Co.), (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

On December 29, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Sun Loans was served with Plaintiff's Complaint on January 2, 2018. Presently, Sun Loans' responsive pleading is due by January 23, 2018. The Parties have discussed extending the deadline for Sun Loans to respond to the complaint.

WHEREAS, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Sun Loans to file its responsive pleading by two weeks to February 6, 2018.

This is the first stipulation for extension of time for Sun Loans to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint. The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice to any other party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer