Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. AT&T Corp., : 2:18-cv-01129-RCJ-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181015670 Visitors: 22
Filed: Sep. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VOIP-PAL'S OPPOSITION TO AT&T CORP'S MOTION TO DISMSS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that Defendant AT&T Corp's ("AT&T") time to file a reply to Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Opposition to AT&T Corp's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (ECF 14), filed on September 6, 2018, sh
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VOIP-PAL'S OPPOSITION TO AT&T CORP'S MOTION TO DISMSS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

It is hereby stipulated between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that Defendant AT&T Corp's ("AT&T") time to file a reply to Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Opposition to AT&T Corp's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (ECF 14), filed on September 6, 2018, shall be extended from September 13, 2018, to September 27, 2018.

This is the first stipulation for extension of time for AT&T to file its reply to VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.'s opposition filed by the parties.1 This Stipulation is filed in good faith and is not intended to cause delay.

FootNotes


1. The Court granted an extension for Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss based on an unopposed motion (ECF 10) on August 20, 2018. See Order Granting Extension to Respond to Motion to Dismiss (ECF 11).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer