WALTON v. MILLS, 1:13-cv-01081. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140625a85
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 6, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 19. Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Supplemental Motion to Remand be denied. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Re
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 6, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 19. Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Supplemental Motion to Remand be denied. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Rep..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 6, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 19. Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Supplemental Motion to Remand be denied. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 7) and Supplemental Motion to Remand (ECF No. 12) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
