Malveaux v. Saul, 2:18-cv-01952-DMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190819468
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 7 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 7 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. The current due date is August 15, 2019. The new due date will be August 22, 2019. This is Defendant's third request for an ext
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 7 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 7 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. The current due date is August 15, 2019. The new due date will be August 22, 2019. This is Defendant's third request for an exte..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 7 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 7 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. The current due date is August 15, 2019. The new due date will be August 22, 2019.
This is Defendant's third request for an extension of time for briefing and the sixth request in this case overall. There is good cause for this request. Since the granting of the previous request for an extension of time, the parties explored possible settlement and a supplemental administrative record was lodged. The parties did not reach a settlement. In addition, Defendant's counsel has been addressing a full workload of district court cases and other non-court substantive matters, some of which required her to take additional time to complete, and counsel had been out of the office for pre-approved leave for multiple days. Counsel also has at least four district court matters due between August 15, 2019, to August 22, 2019.
Thus, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time up to and including August 22, 2019, to review the administrative records and to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
Respectfully submitted,
JESSE S. KAPLAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW
(As authorized by email on 8/13/2019)
JESSE S. KAPLAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 USC 405(g)(action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security).
Source: Leagle
