Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc., 97-6910 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 97-6910 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 08, 1999
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 97-6910 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ 07/06/99 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D.C. Docket No. 97-P-1300-S UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus PEMCO AEROPLEX, INC., a subsidiary of Precision Standard Company, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (Opinion February 8 , 1999, 166 F.3d 1311 , 11th Cir., 1999) (July 6,
More
                                                                      PUBLISH
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                    ________________________________                FILED
                                                  U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                               No. 97-6910          ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                    ________________________________     07/06/99
                                                     THOMAS K. KAHN
                                                          CLERK
                         D.C. Docket No. 97-P-1300-S

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff-Appellant,

      versus

PEMCO AEROPLEX, INC., a subsidiary of
Precision Standard Company, a corporation,

                                   Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________

              Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________________________________________________

          (Opinion February 8 , 1999, 
166 F.3d 1311
, 11th Cir., 1999)

                                (July 6, 1999)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH,
DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:
             A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on

whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of

the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

             IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court

en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer