Jackson v. Hubbard, CV 11-4589-JVS (SP). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180521539
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 16, 2018
Latest Update: May 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDE
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDER..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 114) is granted, and therefore Grounds One and Two are dismissed from the First Amended Petition with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
