Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Peterson, 1:17-CR-00255-LJO-SKO-1. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191022755 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS (ECF NO. 80) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Defendant Kyle Peterson pled guilty on March 20, 2019, to one count of receipt of material involving the sexual exploitation of minors. ECF No. 51. He was sentenced on July 15, 2019, to 162 months' incarceration and 180 months' supervised release. ECF No. 66. On October 15, 2019, Defendant filed a request for a copy of various transcripts, stating the "transcripts are needed in order for [Defenda
More

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS (ECF NO. 80)

Defendant Kyle Peterson pled guilty on March 20, 2019, to one count of receipt of material involving the sexual exploitation of minors. ECF No. 51. He was sentenced on July 15, 2019, to 162 months' incarceration and 180 months' supervised release. ECF No. 66. On October 15, 2019, Defendant filed a request for a copy of various transcripts, stating the "transcripts are needed in order for [Defendant] to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255" motion, "based upon a speedy trial violation." ECF No. 80. Defendant "believe[s] that the time waivers [sic] did not comply with statutory guidelines." Id. For the following reasons, the Court denies Defendant's request.

Defendant's request for transcripts is premature under 28 U.S.C. § 735(f). Although Defendant is indigent, he has not filed a habeas petition, and therefore, he is not entitled to copies of transcripts at government expense until he has done so. United States v. Connors, 904 F.2d 535, 536 (9th Cir. 1990); United States v. Lucatero, No. 05-cr-0443-WBS, 2007 WL 1747077, at *2 (E.D. Cal. June 18, 2007) ("The vast majority of courts have interpreted [28 U.S.C. § 753(f)] to mean that until a prisoner actually `brings a proceeding under section 2255,' he is not entitled under § 753(f) to have costs for creating or copying such transcripts or other documents paid by the United States."). In the absence of Defendant actually filing a post-conviction motion, the Court cannot determine whether his motion is frivolous, as required by § 753(f).1 Therefore, his request for a free copy of transcripts is DENIED. Defendant is free to request that the transcripts be prepared at his own expense. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to serve on Defendant a transcript request form along with a copy of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Court notes, without prognosticating on the merits of any later transcript request, that Defendant's plea agreement waives most collateral attacks on his conviction. See ECF No. 50. Assuming arguendo that Defendant files a § 2255 petition presenting a speedy trial claim, Defendant's request for transcripts will be evaluated in light of his plea agreement and under existing law, which currently requires a showing that the defendant is "permitted to sue or appeal in forma pauperis," and a certification by the trial judge that (1) "the suit or appeal is not frivolous" and (2) "that the transcript is needed to decide the issue presented by the suit or appeal." 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer