ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY

(Doc. No. 127.)

DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.

On April 17, 2019, defendants Pam Ahlin, Stephen Mayberg, Audrey King, Brandon Price, Ron Withrow, Kiran Hundal, Ron Howard, Cynthia Radavasky, and former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (collectively the "state defendants") moved for a stay in this action. (Doc. No. 127.) Those same defendants had previously filed a motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 126), requesting that the court reconsider its previous dismissal order in light of intervening Ninth Circuit authority. See Hines v. Youseff, 914 F.3d 1218, 1224 (9th Cir. 2019), petition for cert. filed sub nom. Smith v. Schwarzenegger, No. 18-1590 (U.S. June 27, 2019). Anticipating that their motion for reconsideration will likely be granted—the result of which would be dismissal of the state defendants from this case—the state defendants argue that imposition of a stay is appropriate to prevent them from unnecessarily continuing to litigate this case. (See Doc. No. 127-1 at 2-3.) Plaintiff Dougal Samuels filed an opposition to the motion on June 18, 2019. (Doc. No. 131.) The state defendants filed a reply on July 9, 2019. The court deems the motion suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g).

Plaintiff asserts that a stay of this action "is merely an unnecessary waste of the Court's time and expense" in light of the fact that the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hines "holds no relevance[]" to this case. (Doc. No. 131 at 3.) The undersigned disagrees. Without resolving the pending for motion for reconsideration, the court concludes that the issue decided by the Ninth Circuit in Hines —whether the right to be free from heightened exposure to Valley Fever spores was clearly established at a given point in time for purposes of a qualified immunity defense—is clearly relevant to this case. On that basis, the court will exercise its discretion and grant a stay as requested by the state defendants.

For these reasons,

IT IS SO ORDERED.