MOORE v. PIERCE, 1:14-cv-00965-LJO-SAB. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20141016777
Visitors: 24
Filed: Oct. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Robert Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Elaine Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Robert & Elaine Pierce, Inc., dba Sandy's Country Junction; Vittorio Di Cicco; and Sandra Di Cicco, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captione
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Robert Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Elaine Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Robert & Elaine Pierce, Inc., dba Sandy's Country Junction; Vittorio Di Cicco; and Sandra Di Cicco, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Robert Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Elaine Pierce dba Sandy's Country Junction; Robert & Elaine Pierce, Inc., dba Sandy's Country Junction; Vittorio Di Cicco; and Sandra Di Cicco, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
ORDER
The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
