IN RE LIDODERM ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 14-md-02521-WHO. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160822892
Visitors: 24
Filed: Aug. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING ACTAVIS INC.'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE AN ELECTION IN RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OR PRECLUSION (D.I. 536) WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The Court hereby ORDERS that on or before September 15, 2016, Actavis shall file a final election on subjective beliefs as identified in the Court's August 9th Order (ECF No. 536). The portion of that Order directing Actavis to make such election on or before August 16, 2016 is hereby VACATED
Summary: ORDER GRANTING ACTAVIS INC.'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE AN ELECTION IN RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OR PRECLUSION (D.I. 536) WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The Court hereby ORDERS that on or before September 15, 2016, Actavis shall file a final election on subjective beliefs as identified in the Court's August 9th Order (ECF No. 536). The portion of that Order directing Actavis to make such election on or before August 16, 2016 is hereby VACATED...
More
ORDER GRANTING ACTAVIS INC.'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE AN ELECTION IN RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OR PRECLUSION (D.I. 536)
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
The Court hereby ORDERS that on or before September 15, 2016, Actavis shall file a final election on subjective beliefs as identified in the Court's August 9th Order (ECF No. 536). The portion of that Order directing Actavis to make such election on or before August 16, 2016 is hereby VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle