U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 2:CR 05-0477 WBS. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140421557
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. On July 31, 2013, defendant filed a Notice of Appeal from the denial of his request for reduction of sentence. (Docket No. 85.) That appeal is presently pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Defendant's presently pending Motion for Reconsideration Denying Defendants [sic] Previous Motion Directing the United States Probation Department to Correct P.S.R. Inaccuracies (Docket No 92) was filed on February 24, 2014, while that
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. On July 31, 2013, defendant filed a Notice of Appeal from the denial of his request for reduction of sentence. (Docket No. 85.) That appeal is presently pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Defendant's presently pending Motion for Reconsideration Denying Defendants [sic] Previous Motion Directing the United States Probation Department to Correct P.S.R. Inaccuracies (Docket No 92) was filed on February 24, 2014, while that a..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
On July 31, 2013, defendant filed a Notice of Appeal from the denial of his request for reduction of sentence. (Docket No. 85.) That appeal is presently pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Defendant's presently pending Motion for Reconsideration Denying Defendants [sic] Previous Motion Directing the United States Probation Department to Correct P.S.R. Inaccuracies (Docket No 92) was filed on February 24, 2014, while that appeal was pending. This court accordingly lacks jurisdiction over the pending motion. See United States v. Powell, 24 F.3d 28, 31 (9th Cir. 1994).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 92) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED, pursuant to Rule 37(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Source: Leagle
