CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Defendant PadMapper, Inc. ("PadMapper") intends to bring a Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion") as to various of craigslist, Inc.'s ("craigslist") claims.
WHEREAS, craigslist has not yet seen PadMapper's Motion and is not stipulating to the propriety of the Motion. This Stipulation in no way waives or limits any of craigslist's rights, including craigslist's right to seek relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 56(d) or otherwise.
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to the below proposed briefing schedule, subject to craigslist's reservation of rights as set forth above.
WHEREAS, PadMapper seeks an enlargement of the page limit to 40 pages, given the complexity of its Motion.
WHEREAS, craigslist agrees to enlarge the page limit to 40 pages for PadMapper's Motion, so long as the page limit for craigslist's Opposition is reciprocally extended to 40 pages.
Now therefore, the parties, through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
(1) PadMapper will file its Motion for Summary Judgment on Friday, October 3, 2014, and the page limit is extended to 40 pages.
(2) craigslist's opposition is due on Wednesday, November 12, 2014, and the page limit is extended to 40 pages.
(3) PadMapper's reply is due on Wednesday, November 26, 2014.
I, Brian Hennessy, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.
(1) PadMapper will file its Motion for Summary Judgment on Friday, October 3, 2014, and the page limit is extended to 40 pages.
(2) craigslist's opposition is due on Wednesday, November 12, 2014, and the page limit is extended to 40 pages.
(3) PadMapper's reply is due on Wednesday, November 26, 2014.