Beland v. Ortiz, 4:17-cv-01816-HSG. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170906b79
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-1(a) TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE FOR CIRCULATING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 1, 2017 and ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff Victoria Beland, Trustee of the Dora Gomez Revocable Trust ("Plaintiff") and defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The deadline for Plaintiff to provide Defendant a draft of the proposed amended
Summary: STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-1(a) TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE FOR CIRCULATING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 1, 2017 and ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff Victoria Beland, Trustee of the Dora Gomez Revocable Trust ("Plaintiff") and defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The deadline for Plaintiff to provide Defendant a draft of the proposed amended ..
More
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-1(a) TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE FOR CIRCULATING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 1, 2017 and ORDER
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff Victoria Beland, Trustee of the Dora Gomez Revocable Trust ("Plaintiff") and defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The deadline for Plaintiff to provide Defendant a draft of the proposed amended complaint, currently scheduled for September 1, 2017, will be continued for ten (10) days to September 11, 2017.
2. On or before September 19, 2017, the parties will file a joint statement informing the Court whether or not there is a stipulation to permit amendment of the complaint.
A continuance of the September 1, 2017 deadline for drafting the amended complaint is needed because counsel for Plaintiff has had other case conflicts preventing the completion of the drafted amended complaint. The parties agree that this stipulation will not prejudice any party's rights with respect to this proceeding before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
