Filed: Apr. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, on December 20, 2011, the defendant was arraigned on the indictment before Magistrate Judge Spero; WHEREAS, on December 23, 2011, the United States produced documents and other materials to counsel for the defendant; WHEREAS, on May 1, 2012, the United States filed a superseding indictment adding charges in this case; WHEREAS, on May 8, 2012, the United States produced documen
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, on December 20, 2011, the defendant was arraigned on the indictment before Magistrate Judge Spero; WHEREAS, on December 23, 2011, the United States produced documents and other materials to counsel for the defendant; WHEREAS, on May 1, 2012, the United States filed a superseding indictment adding charges in this case; WHEREAS, on May 8, 2012, the United States produced document..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2011, the defendant was arraigned on the indictment before Magistrate Judge Spero;
WHEREAS, on December 23, 2011, the United States produced documents and other materials to counsel for the defendant;
WHEREAS, on May 1, 2012, the United States filed a superseding indictment adding charges in this case;
WHEREAS, on May 8, 2012, the United States produced documents and other materials to counsel for the defendant;
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2012, the Superior Court of the State of California issued an order unsealing the affidavits supporting the search warrants in the parallel state prosecution and the United States Attorney's Office, in reliance thereon, produced the underlying search warrant affidavits to counsel for the defendant, as requested;
WHEREAS, on August 28, 2012, the defendant moved to suppress evidence;
WHEREAS, on March 15, 2013, the Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress evidence;
WHEREAS, on April 2, 2013, the Court issued an order denying the motion to suppress evidence;
WHEREAS, counsel for the defendant needs time for effective preparation following the Court's ruling;
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2013, the Court ordered a settlement conference, which is scheduled for May 9, 2013 before Magistrate Judge Beeler.
THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the case should be continued from April 16, 2013 to May 21, 2013; and the period of time from April 16, 2013 to May 21, 2013 shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial of the offenses alleged in the Indictment must commence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161.
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The ends of justice are served by finding that a continuance from April 16, 2013 to May 21, 2013 outweighs the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and the prompt disposition of criminal cases and the Court concludes that the exclusion of time from April 16, 2013 to May 21, 2013 should be made under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
