Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DeFilippo v. County of Stanislaus, 1:18-cv-00496-AWI-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180531866 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 30, 2018
Latest Update: May 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs Georgia DeFilippo and Christina DeFilippo ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendants City of Modesto and Jon Evers ("Modesto Defendants") hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. This action was filed on April 10, 2018. 2. The Modesto Defendants were served with a copy of the complaint on May 11, 2018. 3. The Modesto Defendants response to the complaint
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Georgia DeFilippo and Christina DeFilippo ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendants City of Modesto and Jon Evers ("Modesto Defendants") hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. This action was filed on April 10, 2018.

2. The Modesto Defendants were served with a copy of the complaint on May 11, 2018.

3. The Modesto Defendants response to the complaint is currently due on June 1, 2018 (the "Response Deadline").

4. The Modesto Defendants requested a continuance of the Response Deadline from Plaintiffs, representing that their counsel for this case were busy with other matters that would prevent them from responding to the complaint by June 1, 2018.

5. Plaintiffs responded that, in addition to being amenable to the requested extension sought by the Modesto Defendants, Plaintiffs believe that this action should be stayed while a related criminal case involving some of the same facts as the present action is pending, which case will implicate and hinder discovery in the present action (the "Related Pending Criminal Case").

6. The Modesto Defendants are amenable to a stay of this action due to the Related Pending Criminal Case should Plaintiffs seek such a stay in this action.

7. Although a stay of this case may subsequently be sought by Plaintiffs and the other parties in this case, due to the upcoming Response Deadline, Plaintiffs and the Modesto Defendants agree that the Modesto Defendants shall have until August 31, 2018 to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

The filer, David Mehretu, attests that all other signatories listed on whose behalf this filing is submitted concur in the filing's content and have authorized the filing.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the time for the Modesto Defendants to respond to the complaint is extended to August 31, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer