Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BRAZILL v. CALIFORNIA NORTHSTATE COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, LLC, 2:12CV-01218-WBS-GGH. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140107756 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. 1. Whereas, pursuant to the Court's September 13, 2012 Pretrial Scheduling Order, this matter was originally set for trial on November 26, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. 2. Whereas, pursuant to the Court's October 15, 2013 Final Pretrial Order, the trial of this matter was continued to February 4, 2014, with an anticipated length of trial of five to seven days. 3. Whereas, Defendant California Northstate College of Pharmacy, LLC's ("Defendan
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

1. Whereas, pursuant to the Court's September 13, 2012 Pretrial Scheduling Order, this matter was originally set for trial on November 26, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

2. Whereas, pursuant to the Court's October 15, 2013 Final Pretrial Order, the trial of this matter was continued to February 4, 2014, with an anticipated length of trial of five to seven days.

3. Whereas, Defendant California Northstate College of Pharmacy, LLC's ("Defendant") retained and disclosed employment attorney expert is scheduled to be out of the country for a pre-paid vacation from February 4, 2014 through February 11, 2014, such that she is unavailable for the current trial date.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel, that the trial currently set in the above-captioned matter for February 4, 2014 be continued to February 17, 2014, or as soon thereafter as the Court's calendar permits, provided that the continued trial date shall not conflict with the following dates on Defendant's counsel's calendar: (1) pre-paid vacation from March 19, 2013 through March 24, 2013; (2) 10-14 day trial commencing on June 23, 2014 in Placer County; and (3) 14-17 day trial commencing on July 14, 2014 in Sacramento County, nor conflict with the dates on Plaintiff's counsel's calendar: (1) one-week jury trial on February 24, 2014 in Sacramento County; (2) two to three week jury trial on April 28, 2014 in Yolo County; (3) one-week jury trial on August 18, 2014 in the Eastern District of California. The parties further stipulate that the pre-trial deadlines relating to the following issues, as set forth in the Court's Final Pretrial Order, will be based on the new trial date: (1) jury instructions and proposed form of verdict; (2) voir dire questions; (3) trial briefs; (4) exhibits; (5) use of depositions or interrogatories; and (6) motions in limine. Dated: January 3, 2014.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR,

1. THE FEBRUARY 4, 2014 TRIAL DATE IS VACATED.

2. TRIAL OF THIS MATTER IS RESET FOR FEBRUARY 19, 2014 AT 9:00 A.M.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer