COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO v. TURBOMECA S.A., 2:07-cv-01398 WBS KJN. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120420840
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. An unopposed motion to compel the production of certain radar data (Dkt. No. 73) filed by defendants Turbomeca S.A. and Turbomeca USA, Inc. ("Turbomeca Defendants") is set to be heard by the undersigned on May 3, 2012. 1 However, on April 13, 2012, the Turbomeca Defendants filed a Notice of Settlement (Dkt. No. 80), which provides "that all parties have agreed to settle this matter," subject to approval by the County of Sacramento's Board of Supervis
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. An unopposed motion to compel the production of certain radar data (Dkt. No. 73) filed by defendants Turbomeca S.A. and Turbomeca USA, Inc. ("Turbomeca Defendants") is set to be heard by the undersigned on May 3, 2012. 1 However, on April 13, 2012, the Turbomeca Defendants filed a Notice of Settlement (Dkt. No. 80), which provides "that all parties have agreed to settle this matter," subject to approval by the County of Sacramento's Board of Superviso..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
An unopposed motion to compel the production of certain radar data (Dkt. No. 73) filed by defendants Turbomeca S.A. and Turbomeca USA, Inc. ("Turbomeca Defendants") is set to be heard by the undersigned on May 3, 2012.1 However, on April 13, 2012, the Turbomeca Defendants filed a Notice of Settlement (Dkt. No. 80), which provides "that all parties have agreed to settle this matter," subject to approval by the County of Sacramento's Board of Supervisors.
In light of the Notice of Settlement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The May 3, 2012 hearing on the Turbomeca Defendants' motion to compel (Dkt. No. 73) is vacated.
2. The Turbomeca Defendants may re-notice their motion to compel if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Source: Leagle
