Reyna v. County of Los Angeles, 2:19-cv-02629-PA-MAA. (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200316a08
Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, as follows: 1. The First Amendment retaliation aspect of the first claim, as described in Paragraph 25(a) of the First Amended Complaint, is hereby dismissed against the individual defendants, with prejudice. 2. The judicial deception aspect of the first claim, as described in Paragraph 25(d) of the First Amended Complaint, is hereby dismissed against the
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, as follows: 1. The First Amendment retaliation aspect of the first claim, as described in Paragraph 25(a) of the First Amended Complaint, is hereby dismissed against the individual defendants, with prejudice. 2. The judicial deception aspect of the first claim, as described in Paragraph 25(d) of the First Amended Complaint, is hereby dismissed against the i..
More
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, as follows:
1. The First Amendment retaliation aspect of the first claim, as described in Paragraph 25(a) of the First Amended Complaint, is hereby dismissed against the individual defendants, with prejudice.
2. The judicial deception aspect of the first claim, as described in Paragraph 25(d) of the First Amended Complaint, is hereby dismissed against the individual defendants, with prejudice.
Source: Leagle