STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION

[L.R. CIV. 6-2]

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiff Jeffrey L. Pytel ("Plaintiff"), by and through his undersigned counsel, and Defendants Sunrun Inc., Lynn Jurich, Bob Komin, Edward Fenster, Jameson McJunkin, Gerald Risk, Steve Vassallo, Richard Wong, Beau Peelle, Eren Omer Atesmen, Reginald Norris, William Elmore, Foundation Capital VI, L.P., and Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC (the "Sunrun Defendants"), as well as Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (the "Underwriter Defendants," collectively with the Sunrun Defendants, "Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand this action on May 17, 2016;

WHEREAS, the plaintiffs in five additional actions against Defendants filed motions to remand those actions between May 17, 2016, and May 19, 2016;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Defendants' opposition to Plaintiff's motion is currently due by May 31, 2016;

WHEREAS Plaintiff's reply to Defendants' opposition is currently due by June 7, 2016;

WHEREAS Plaintiff's motion is scheduled to be heard in this Court on July 28, 2016;

WHEREAS Defendants have moved the Court for an Order relating the six pending removed state court securities class actions to the similar securities class action originally filed in federal court;

WHEREAS the plaintiffs in the six removed actions have opposed Defendants' Motion to Relate, and instead requested that the Court relate only the six removed state court securities class actions;

WHEREAS Defendants' motion is currently under submission before the Hon. Charles R. Breyer;

WHEREAS the undersigned parties are currently negotiating with plaintiffs in the five additional removed actions regarding coordinated briefing on the pending motions to remand;

WHEREAS the undersigned parties agree that a short extension of time for Defendants to oppose Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is appropriate in light of the anticipated coordinated briefing of the six pending motions to remand;

WHEREAS this extension will not affect the noticed hearing date;

WHEREAS, in the interest of efficiency and judicial economy, the parties have previously stipulated to defer Defendant's response to the complaint in this action pending the resolution of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand;

WHEREAS, other than the dates of the opposition and reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, this stipulation will not affect or alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order or otherwise affect the schedule of the case;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows:

1. Defendants shall file an opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand on or before June 2, 2016; and,

2. Plaintiff shall file a reply to Defendants' opposition on or before June 9, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE

I, Anna Erickson White, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that James I. Jaconette and Patrick D. Robbins concur in this filing.