Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (SECOND REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Moharram Jafarian ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, Sun Loan Company of Nevada, Inc. (erroneously served as Sun Loan Co.), (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: On December 29, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Sun Loans was served with Plaintiff's Complaint on January 2, 2018. Sun Loan
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (SECOND REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Moharram Jafarian ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, Sun Loan Company of Nevada, Inc. (erroneously served as Sun Loan Co.), (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: On December 29, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Sun Loans was served with Plaintiff's Complaint on January 2, 2018. Sun Loans..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
(SECOND REQUEST)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Moharram Jafarian ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, Sun Loan Company of Nevada, Inc. (erroneously served as Sun Loan Co.), (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
On December 29, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Sun Loans was served with Plaintiff's Complaint on January 2, 2018. Sun Loans responsive pleading was due on January 23, 2018. The parties stipulated to extend Sun loans time to respond to the complaint.
Thereafter the parties have commenced discussing possible settlement of the above-entitled action.
WHEREAS, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Sun Loans to file its responsive pleading by two weeks to February 27, 2018.
This is the second stipulation for extension of time for Sun Loans to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint. The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice to any other party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
