Baird v. Midland Credit Management, Inc., 3:19-cv-03937-MMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191011e62
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Stipulation re Settlement. The Parties have reached a settlement of the entire action and request additional time to finalize the settlement. Having read and considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation re Settlement, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The Parties have until Octobe
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Stipulation re Settlement. The Parties have reached a settlement of the entire action and request additional time to finalize the settlement. Having read and considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation re Settlement, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The Parties have until October..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT
Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Stipulation re Settlement. The Parties have reached a settlement of the entire action and request additional time to finalize the settlement.
Having read and considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation re Settlement, and good cause appearing therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The Parties have until October 31, 2019 within which to either file a dismissal of the entire action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) or file a status report regarding the progress of their settlement efforts; and
2. All pending Court dates — including the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint — are vacated.
ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
