Leskinen v. Perdue, 2:18-cv-0453-TLN-KJN PS. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190228809
Visitors: 29
Filed: Feb. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On February 21, 2019, plaintiff filed a request to exceed the 20-page limitation set by the assigned district judge's standing order for her opposition brief to defendant's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 45.) Defendant opposes the motion. (ECF No. 46.) Plaintiff fails to show good cause to exceed the page limit, especially given that defendant's motion for summary judgment is only 15 pages long. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On February 21, 2019, plaintiff filed a request to exceed the 20-page limitation set by the assigned district judge's standing order for her opposition brief to defendant's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 45.) Defendant opposes the motion. (ECF No. 46.) Plaintiff fails to show good cause to exceed the page limit, especially given that defendant's motion for summary judgment is only 15 pages long. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On February 21, 2019, plaintiff filed a request to exceed the 20-page limitation set by the assigned district judge's standing order for her opposition brief to defendant's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 45.) Defendant opposes the motion. (ECF No. 46.)
Plaintiff fails to show good cause to exceed the page limit, especially given that defendant's motion for summary judgment is only 15 pages long.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion to exceed the page limit (ECF No. 45) is DENIED.
2. Any pages of briefing exceeding the 20 page-limit will not be considered by the court.
Source: Leagle
