HUGHES v. WALKER, 2:10-cv-3024 WBS GGH P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20141230c60
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the time within which petitioner is to file a motion for reconsideration 1 of the order denying evidentiary hearing is extended to December 29, 2014 FootNotes 1. Petitioner styles his request as one for an extension in which to file objections; however, since the ruling was by order, the proper procedure to object is by a motion for reconsideration. See E. D. Local Rules 230(j) (standards and pro
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the time within which petitioner is to file a motion for reconsideration 1 of the order denying evidentiary hearing is extended to December 29, 2014 FootNotes 1. Petitioner styles his request as one for an extension in which to file objections; however, since the ruling was by order, the proper procedure to object is by a motion for reconsideration. See E. D. Local Rules 230(j) (standards and proc..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the time within which petitioner is to file a motion for reconsideration1 of the order denying evidentiary hearing is extended to December 29, 2014
FootNotes
1. Petitioner styles his request as one for an extension in which to file objections; however, since the ruling was by order, the proper procedure to object is by a motion for reconsideration. See E. D. Local Rules 230(j) (standards and procedure); 303(c) (reconsideration by a district judge).
Source: Leagle
