Filed: Mar. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2014
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER MEMORIALIZING COURT RULINGS OF MARCH 12, 2014 WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. WHEREAS Plaintiff Skynet, Inc. ("Skynet"), and Defendants Flextronics International, Ltd., and Power Systems Technologies Ltd. (collectively, "Flextronics") appeared before the Court on March 12, 2014, for a hearing regarding Skynet's request for sanctions based upon alleged violations of the Court's January 8, 2014 Stipulated Discovery Order ("SDO") [Dkt. No.112], the Court RULED as follows: 1. A
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER MEMORIALIZING COURT RULINGS OF MARCH 12, 2014 WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. WHEREAS Plaintiff Skynet, Inc. ("Skynet"), and Defendants Flextronics International, Ltd., and Power Systems Technologies Ltd. (collectively, "Flextronics") appeared before the Court on March 12, 2014, for a hearing regarding Skynet's request for sanctions based upon alleged violations of the Court's January 8, 2014 Stipulated Discovery Order ("SDO") [Dkt. No.112], the Court RULED as follows: 1. As..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER MEMORIALIZING COURT RULINGS OF MARCH 12, 2014
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
WHEREAS Plaintiff Skynet, Inc. ("Skynet"), and Defendants Flextronics International, Ltd., and Power Systems Technologies Ltd. (collectively, "Flextronics") appeared before the Court on March 12, 2014, for a hearing regarding Skynet's request for sanctions based upon alleged violations of the Court's January 8, 2014 Stipulated Discovery Order ("SDO") [Dkt. No.112], the Court RULED as follows:
1. As to Paragraph 1 of the SDO, the Paragraph is not clear enough for sanctions.
2. As to Paragraph 6 of the SDO, Flextronics is in violation. The Court will explain to the jury what occurred with regard to Paragraph 6 and that Flextronics is in violation.
3. Flextronics shall produce all documents required by Paragraph 6 of the SDO by Monday March 17, 2014 at 5:00pm
4. As to Paragraph 7 of the SDO, except for possibly violating the January 8th deadline, the Court was not shown at the hearing that there is a significant violation of paragraph 7.
5. All of Skynet's March 6, 2014 letter brief requesting sanctions [Dkt. No. 116] not ruled on by the Court and all further discovery disputes are referred to the Magistrate Judge to be assigned to this matter.
IT IS SO AGREED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
PURSUANT TO AGREEMENT, IT IS SO ORDERED.
