VACC, Inc. v. Davis, 3:16-cv-01350 JCS. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160519b06
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Local Rule 6.1(a)] JOSEPH C. SPERO , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), Plaintiff VACC, Inc. and Defendant, Jon Byron Davis, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Defendant shall have an additional thirty (30) days beyond the time period prescribed for the response after service of the Complaint, which was filed in this matter by Plaintiff on March 18, 2016. Defendant's response to the Complaint
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Local Rule 6.1(a)] JOSEPH C. SPERO , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), Plaintiff VACC, Inc. and Defendant, Jon Byron Davis, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Defendant shall have an additional thirty (30) days beyond the time period prescribed for the response after service of the Complaint, which was filed in this matter by Plaintiff on March 18, 2016. Defendant's response to the Complaint i..
More
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Local Rule 6.1(a)]
JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), Plaintiff VACC, Inc. and Defendant, Jon Byron Davis, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Defendant shall have an additional thirty (30) days beyond the time period prescribed for the response after service of the Complaint, which was filed in this matter by Plaintiff on March 18, 2016. Defendant's response to the Complaint is due on or before Monday, June 27, 2016.
The extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5.1
Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories, and shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signed on May 17, 2016 in San Francisco, California.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
