Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kline v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC, 2:19-cv-2387 JAM KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191205906 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER RELATING CASES WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), because both cases involve removal of the same case from state court. Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties. The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely
More

ORDER RELATING CASES

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), because both cases involve removal of the same case from state court. Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated Kline v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-877 WBS KJN, and Kline v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-2387 JAM KJN, be, and the same hereby are, deemed related. The case denominated Kline v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-2387 JAM KJN, shall be reassigned to the Honorable WILLIAM B. SHUBB. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the captions on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as Kline v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC, 19-cv-2387 WBS KJN.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make an appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases to compensate for this reassignment.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer