Hyphy Music, Inc. v. Hernandez,, 1:17-cv-00182-DAD-SKO. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171122c37
Visitors: 36
Filed: Nov. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN EXCESS OF 28 DAYS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Local Rule 144(a) (Doc. 29) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is a stipulation of Plaintiff and Defendant Abel De Luna for an extension of time for Defendant Abel De Luna to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 29.) The parties indicate that "[i]n light of the fact that Plaintiff has elected not to file any amendment to the First Amended Complain
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN EXCESS OF 28 DAYS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Local Rule 144(a) (Doc. 29) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is a stipulation of Plaintiff and Defendant Abel De Luna for an extension of time for Defendant Abel De Luna to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 29.) The parties indicate that "[i]n light of the fact that Plaintiff has elected not to file any amendment to the First Amended Complaint..
More
ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN EXCESS OF 28 DAYS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Local Rule 144(a)
(Doc. 29)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is a stipulation of Plaintiff and Defendant Abel De Luna for an extension of time for Defendant Abel De Luna to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 29.) The parties indicate that "[i]n light of the fact that Plaintiff has elected not to file any amendment to the First Amended Complaint, it is now appropriate for Defendant Abel De Luna to file a response to the First Amended Complaint." (Doc. 29, ¶ 5.) For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant ABEL DE LUNA's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended to December 4, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
