Diaz-Orellana v. Nielsen, 3:18-cv-03448-WHO. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180716819
Visitors: 172
Filed: Jul. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS MOOT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Petitioner filed a writ of habeas corpus on June 11, 2018, in part to seek a new bond hearing. On July 12, 2018, Petitioner received a bond hearing before the San Francisco Immigration Court. Petitioner and Respondents, through their undersigned counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE to the following: 1. Because Petitioner received a bond hearing, the instant petition for writ of habeas c
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS MOOT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Petitioner filed a writ of habeas corpus on June 11, 2018, in part to seek a new bond hearing. On July 12, 2018, Petitioner received a bond hearing before the San Francisco Immigration Court. Petitioner and Respondents, through their undersigned counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE to the following: 1. Because Petitioner received a bond hearing, the instant petition for writ of habeas co..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS MOOT
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Petitioner filed a writ of habeas corpus on June 11, 2018, in part to seek a new bond hearing. On July 12, 2018, Petitioner received a bond hearing before the San Francisco Immigration Court.
Petitioner and Respondents, through their undersigned counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE to the following:
1. Because Petitioner received a bond hearing, the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed as moot.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
