Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dahlin v. Frieborn, 2:17-cv-02585-MCE-AC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190115b36 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS FIRST MOTION TO DISMISS MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . WHEREAS, on October 17, 2018, Plaintiffs James Dahlin, Kimberly Dahlin, Toby Tippets and Martina Tippets (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") filed their First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the above-captioned matter in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, against Defendants Rosemary Frieborn, Curt Ransom, Marilyn Jasper, Ca
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS FIRST MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, on October 17, 2018, Plaintiffs James Dahlin, Kimberly Dahlin, Toby Tippets and Martina Tippets (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") filed their First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the above-captioned matter in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, against Defendants Rosemary Frieborn, Curt Ransom, Marilyn Jasper, Cassie Reeves, Katie Newman, Sherry Couzens, Michael Crosson, Shana Laursen, the Humane Society of the Sierra Foothills, Inc., Friends of Auburn/Tahoe Vista-Placer County Animal Shelter, Inc., Friends of Placer County Animal Shelter, Friends of Auburn/Tahoe Vista Placer County Animal Shelter, and Edward Fritz (collectively, the "Non-Municipal Defendants"), City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, Officer Debbie Nelson, Officer Phillip Isetta, Officer Angela McCollough, and Sergeant Tucker Huey (collectively, the "Municipal Defendants"), and Thomas Sheriff;

WHEREAS, the Non Municipal Defendants and Municipal Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss (see Doc 80, Doc 81); WHEREAS, Defendant Thomas Sheriff filed a Motion to Dismiss (see Doc 86);

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Plaintiffs, to respond to Municipal Defendants Motion to Dismiss is due December 28, 2018 (see Doc. 80);

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Plaintiffs, to respond to Non-Municipal Defendants Motion to Dismiss is due January 10, 2019 (see Doc 81);

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendant Thomas Sheriff Motion to Dismiss is due January 10, 2019 (see Doc 86);

WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs, and Municipal Defendants agree that the interests of efficiency and justice will be promoted if Plaintiffs file their responses to the Motion to Dismiss at the same time;

NOW, THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO EASTERN DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 144(A), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the Plaintiffs, the and Municipal Defendants that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is extended to January 10, 2019.

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation (ECF No. 88), the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is extended to January 10, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer