MOHAMED v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 3:14-CV-05200-EMC. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150202375
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Abdul Kadir Mohamed ("Plaintiff') and Defendant Hirease, LLC ("Defendant") hereby stipulate to extend the time which Defendant has to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on November 24, 2014, and Defendant was served the Complaint and Summons on December 10, 20
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Abdul Kadir Mohamed ("Plaintiff') and Defendant Hirease, LLC ("Defendant") hereby stipulate to extend the time which Defendant has to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on November 24, 2014, and Defendant was served the Complaint and Summons on December 10, 201..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Abdul Kadir Mohamed ("Plaintiff') and Defendant Hirease, LLC ("Defendant") hereby stipulate to extend the time which Defendant has to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on November 24, 2014, and Defendant was served the Complaint and Summons on December 10, 2014. With this Stipulation, Defendant's deadline for answering or otherwise responding to the Complaint is extended to February 16, 2015.
The parties respectfully submit this Stipulation to the Court pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a).
IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
