Osterhout v. Berryhill, 3:16-CV-3100. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180427b11
Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS , District Judge . Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) filed in this case on April 9, 2018, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTE
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS , District Judge . Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) filed in this case on April 9, 2018, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge.
Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) filed in this case on April 9, 2018, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the decision of the ALJ is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
