Filed: Aug. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT OAKRIDGE INDUSTRIES, INC.'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL [ECF Nos. 78, 79, & 80] (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Mark Elliott, and Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc., stipulate and agree, through their respective counsels of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension up to and including August 9, 2017, to file his response to Oakridge Industries, Inc.'s Motions to Compel [Docket/ECH Numbers 78, 79,
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT OAKRIDGE INDUSTRIES, INC.'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL [ECF Nos. 78, 79, & 80] (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Mark Elliott, and Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc., stipulate and agree, through their respective counsels of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension up to and including August 9, 2017, to file his response to Oakridge Industries, Inc.'s Motions to Compel [Docket/ECH Numbers 78, 79, a..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT OAKRIDGE INDUSTRIES, INC.'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL [ECF Nos. 78, 79, & 80]
(FIRST REQUEST)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Mark Elliott, and Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc., stipulate and agree, through their respective counsels of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension up to and including August 9, 2017, to file his response to Oakridge Industries, Inc.'s Motions to Compel [Docket/ECH Numbers 78, 79, and 80]. The parties enter into this stipulation to allow additional time to Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel to prepare a response.
Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc. will file its reply by August, 23, 2017.
This is the Plaintiff's first request for an extension of this deadline and it is submitted in good faith without purpose of prejudice or undue delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
