Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GARRISON v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC., 4:14-CV-00334-VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141215679 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LIMITED MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiffs MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively "Plaintiffs"), on the one hand, and Defendants WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC. and MRS. GOOCH'S NATURAL FOOD MARKETS, INC. ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Cou
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LIMITED MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiffs MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively "Plaintiffs"), on the one hand, and Defendants WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC. and MRS. GOOCH'S NATURAL FOOD MARKETS, INC. ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court entered a scheduling order ("Scheduling Order") designating an initial phase of discovery limited to (1) written fact and document discovery targeted to information necessary to prepare for mediation; and (2) the completion of the depositions of Plaintiffs. (Dkt. #41).

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order currently requires this phase of discovery to be completed on or before December 15, 2014 and further requires the Parties to complete a mediation on or before February 2, 2015 before reporting back to the Court for a further case management conference on February 10, 2015.

WHEREAS, the Parties are presently attempting to resolve certain disputes regarding written discovery without burdening the Court, but require additional time to attempt to resolve them and thereafter take Plaintiffs' depositions.

WHEREAS, the Parties further seek clarification and certainty as to the preservation of the right to move to compel with respect to any written discovery propounded during this initial phase of discovery to assist the Parties in their efforts to resolve their dispute without seeking intervention from the Court.

WHEREAS, the additional time the Parties seek will not alter the current deadline to complete mediation as the Parties are currently scheduled to participate in a private mediation on February 2, 2015, within the time contemplated in the Scheduling Order.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that:

1. The deadline to complete the current phase of fact discovery shall be continued to January 16, 2015 for the limited purposes of allowing the parties to: (a) resolve their dispute as to Plaintiffs' responses to Defendants' written discovery, including but not limited to Plaintiffs' document production; and (2) complete the depositions of Plaintiffs.

2. To the extent the Parties do not move to compel with respect to any written discovery propounded in this initial phase of discovery prior to the mediation, the Parties reserve the right to move to compel with respect to all such written discovery up to and including 7 days after the close of all fact discovery in the action pursuant to Local Rule 37-3.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

1. The deadline to complete the current phase of initial fact discovery shall be continued to January 16, 2015 for the limited purposes of allowing the parties to: (a) resolve their dispute as to Plaintiffs' responses to Defendants' written discovery, including but not limited to Plaintiffs' document production; and (2) complete the depositions of Plaintiffs.

2. To the extent the Parties do not move to compel with respect to any written discovery prior to the mediation, the Parties shall be permitted to move to compel with respect to any written discovery up to and including 7 days after the close of all fact discovery in the action pursuant to Local Rule 37-3, or as otherwise ordered by the Court. It shall be sufficient to satisfy this deadline to move to compel that the Parties submit the joint letter brief required in paragraph 9 of this Court's civil standing order by the motion to compel deadline.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer