Contawe v. County of San Mateo, 15-cv-00222-JD. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160502919
Visitors: 28
Filed: Apr. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE SANCTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 57 JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court issued an order directing plaintiff's attorney Nikolaus W. Reed to "show cause in writing why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions pursuant to its inherent powers for his failure to appear at a noticed hearing in this matter" on Wednesday, April 20, 2016. Dkt. No. 55. The Court finds that Mr. Reed's response to the order, Dkt. No. 57, fails to show good cause for his unexcused failure to appear. Mr
Summary: ORDER RE SANCTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 57 JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court issued an order directing plaintiff's attorney Nikolaus W. Reed to "show cause in writing why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions pursuant to its inherent powers for his failure to appear at a noticed hearing in this matter" on Wednesday, April 20, 2016. Dkt. No. 55. The Court finds that Mr. Reed's response to the order, Dkt. No. 57, fails to show good cause for his unexcused failure to appear. Mr...
More
ORDER RE SANCTIONS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 57
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
The Court issued an order directing plaintiff's attorney Nikolaus W. Reed to "show cause in writing why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions pursuant to its inherent powers for his failure to appear at a noticed hearing in this matter" on Wednesday, April 20, 2016. Dkt. No. 55.
The Court finds that Mr. Reed's response to the order, Dkt. No. 57, fails to show good cause for his unexcused failure to appear. Mr. Reed is consequently sanctioned in the amount of $200.00, to be paid to the Clerk of the Court, Office of the Clerk, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102-3489, by May 9, 2016. The Court expects that it will not see from Mr. Reed any more unexcused absences going forward.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
