O1 Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corporation, 16-cv-01452-VC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181023f44
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 134 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The Court was advised of the parties' intention to execute a written settlement agreement on October 4, 2018. (Dkt. No. 134). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any pending motions are moot. The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 134 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The Court was advised of the parties' intention to execute a written settlement agreement on October 4, 2018. (Dkt. No. 134). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any pending motions are moot. The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate ..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 134
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
The Court was advised of the parties' intention to execute a written settlement agreement on October 4, 2018. (Dkt. No. 134). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any pending motions are moot.
The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel within 60 days, the dismissal will be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
