Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Ochoa, CR 14-00525 RS. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141110635 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. STIPULATION The United States of America, by and through Special Assistant United States Attorney Philip Kopczynski, and Defendant Jose Eri Ochoa, by and through Assistant Federal Public Defender Geoffrey Hansen, hereby stipulate that, with the Court's approval, the time between November 4, 2014 and November 18, 2014 is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) a
More

STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

STIPULATION

The United States of America, by and through Special Assistant United States Attorney Philip Kopczynski, and Defendant Jose Eri Ochoa, by and through Assistant Federal Public Defender Geoffrey Hansen, hereby stipulate that, with the Court's approval, the time between November 4, 2014 and November 18, 2014 is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for continuity of counsel and effective preparation by counsel.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, upon stipulation of the parties,

THE COURT FINDS that failing to exclude the time between November 4, 2014 and November 18, 2014 would unreasonably deny the defendant's continuity of counsel, and would unreasonably deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between November 4, 2014 and November 18, 2014 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between November 4, 2014 and November 18, 2014 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer