Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

O1 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. AT&T CORPORATION, 3:16-cv-01452-VC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160511946 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 09, 2016
Latest Update: May 09, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . On May 6, 2016, Plaintiff O1 Communications, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant AT&T Corporation stipulated and agreed to requested a two-week continuance in the dates for Plaintiff's Response and Defendant's Reply to the Motion to Dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the parties may stipulate to extend the time for filings that
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

On May 6, 2016, Plaintiff O1 Communications, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant AT&T Corporation stipulated and agreed to requested a two-week continuance in the dates for Plaintiff's Response and Defendant's Reply to the Motion to Dismiss.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the parties may stipulate to extend the time for filings that would affect the date of an event or deadline already fixed by Court order.

The new deadlines for the Response and Reply necessitate rescheduling the hearing date for the Motion.

GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court approves the Stipulations and ORDERS Plaintiffs to respond to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by May 24, 2016, and Defendants to reply by June 1, 2016. Further, the hearing date is extended until June 16, 2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer