PICKARD v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 3:06-cv-00185-CRB. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20131104602
Visitors: 23
Filed: Oct. 31, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request entry of an order lifting the stay in this case ( see ECF No. 181) and establishing the following summary judgment briefing schedule: (1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment — January 7, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit); (2) Plaintiff's Opposition and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment — January 21, 2014 (1 b
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request entry of an order lifting the stay in this case ( see ECF No. 181) and establishing the following summary judgment briefing schedule: (1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment — January 7, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit); (2) Plaintiff's Opposition and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment — January 21, 2014 (1 br..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND ORDER
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request entry of an order lifting the stay in this case (see ECF No. 181) and establishing the following summary judgment briefing schedule:
(1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment — January 7, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit);
(2) Plaintiff's Opposition and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment — January 21, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit);
(3) Defendant's Opposition and Reply — February 11, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit);
(4) Plaintiff's Reply — February 25, 2014 (1 brief, 10-page limit). Hearing — March 28, 2014, 10:00 a.m.
In light of the previous round of summary judgment briefing (see ECF Nos. 140, 152, 161, 162), the parties anticipate incorporating by reference arguments made in those briefs into the forthcoming motions for summary judgment.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
