Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Guillermo v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 3:14-cv-04212-JSW. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141215701 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ("Chase") and CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. ("Caliber") and Plaintiffs GILBERTO F. GUILLERMO and LILLIAN S. CORTES ("Plaintiffs") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, this Court issued an Order on October 2, 2014 setting a Case Management Conference
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ("Chase") and CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. ("Caliber") and Plaintiffs GILBERTO F. GUILLERMO and LILLIAN S. CORTES ("Plaintiffs") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, this Court issued an Order on October 2, 2014 setting a Case Management Conference for January 9, 2015 at 11:00 a.m., and requiring that the Parties submit a joint case management statement no later than January 2, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Parties are required to exchange their initial disclosures on January 2, 2015;

WHEREAS, this Court's October 2, 2014 Order did not set a deadline to meet and confer, or to file an ADR Certification or Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference;

WHEREAS, Defendants Chase and Caliber both filed Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, and the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss is set for January 9, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.;

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to continue the case management conference and all related deadlines, including any ADR-related deadlines, until after this Court has ruled on the Motions to Dismiss. The Parties so stipulate because until those Motions are resolved, it is unclear what claims and theories are properly at issue in this case. Accordingly, the Parties submit that the Court's and the Parties' resources would be conserved by continuing the foregoing deadlines until the Motions to Dismiss have been resolved.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

I, Jessica Woersching, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 9, 2015 shall be continued to February 27, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. 2. The Parties shall submit a joint case management statement on or before February 20, 2015 3. The Parties shall meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan on or before January 30, 2015 4. The Parties shall exchange their initial disclosures and file an ADR Certification and either a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference on or before January 30, 2015

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer