Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gilmour v. Transunion, LLC, 2:18-cv-01211-GMN-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181004h84 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT M&T BANK TO APPEAR AND RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (THIRD REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Robert W. Gilmour II and Defendant, M&T Bank (incorrectly sued as M&T Bank Mortgage) stipulate as follows: On July 12, 2018, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendant M&T Bank. Thus, M&T Bank was originally required to appear and respond to the Complaint on or before August 2, 2018. By Stipulation of the parties and Order of this Court, M&
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT M&T BANK TO APPEAR AND RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (THIRD REQUEST)

Plaintiff, Robert W. Gilmour II and Defendant, M&T Bank (incorrectly sued as M&T Bank Mortgage) stipulate as follows:

On July 12, 2018, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendant M&T Bank. Thus, M&T Bank was originally required to appear and respond to the Complaint on or before August 2, 2018. By Stipulation of the parties and Order of this Court, M&T Bank's time to appear and respond to the Complaint has been extended until on or before September 20, 2018.

Plaintiff and M&T Bank have reached an agreement in principal to settle Plaintiff's claims against M&T Bank. Therefore, Plaintiff and M&T Bank hereby stipulate to extend M&T Bank's time to appear and respond to the Complaint until on or before November 1, 2018, to allow the parties to complete their settlement. This is the third request for an extension of time for M&T Bank to appear and respond to the Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further extensions will be allowed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer