Richardson v. Kinsale Insurance Company, 18-cv-02962-DMR. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190425986
Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY Re: Dkt. Nos. 45, 47 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . On December 26, 2018, the parties submitted a proposed briefing schedule for dispositive motions on the issue of the duty to defend, which the court entered as an order on January 2, 2019. [Docket Nos. 34, 35.] Pursuant to the order, the deadline for each of the parties to file motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgm
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY Re: Dkt. Nos. 45, 47 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . On December 26, 2018, the parties submitted a proposed briefing schedule for dispositive motions on the issue of the duty to defend, which the court entered as an order on January 2, 2019. [Docket Nos. 34, 35.] Pursuant to the order, the deadline for each of the parties to file motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgme..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY
Re: Dkt. Nos. 45, 47
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
On December 26, 2018, the parties submitted a proposed briefing schedule for dispositive motions on the issue of the duty to defend, which the court entered as an order on January 2, 2019. [Docket Nos. 34, 35.] Pursuant to the order, the deadline for each of the parties to file motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgment as to that issue was April 8, 2019. [See Docket No. 35.] Additionally, the last day to file dispositive motions was April 8, 2019. [Docket No. 33.] Instead of complying with the court-ordered briefing schedule, Defendant Kinsale Insurance Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on April 16, 2019 and a motion for summary judgment on April 22, 2019. It also noticed its motion for summary judgment for hearing on less than 35 days notice in violation of Local Rule 7-2(a). Accordingly, the court orders Defendant to respond by April 29, 2019 and show cause why its motions to dismiss and for summary judgment should not be denied as untimely.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
