Filed: Aug. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2013
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. On May 21, 2013, Defendant submitted a Bill of Costs, totaling $2,718.21. Def's Bill of Costs, ECF No. 37. On July 18, 2013, to better evaluate the efficacy of awarding Defendant costs, this court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to file a statement attesting to the current state of her financial resources. Order, ECF No. 38. In response, on August 9, 2013, Plaintiff filed a statement indicating that she "paid 2,718.21 to McCormick [] Barstow Tru
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. On May 21, 2013, Defendant submitted a Bill of Costs, totaling $2,718.21. Def's Bill of Costs, ECF No. 37. On July 18, 2013, to better evaluate the efficacy of awarding Defendant costs, this court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to file a statement attesting to the current state of her financial resources. Order, ECF No. 38. In response, on August 9, 2013, Plaintiff filed a statement indicating that she "paid 2,718.21 to McCormick [] Barstow Trus..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.
On May 21, 2013, Defendant submitted a Bill of Costs, totaling $2,718.21. Def's Bill of Costs, ECF No. 37.
On July 18, 2013, to better evaluate the efficacy of awarding Defendant costs, this court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to file a statement attesting to the current state of her financial resources. Order, ECF No. 38.
In response, on August 9, 2013, Plaintiff filed a statement indicating that she "paid 2,718.21 to McCormick [] Barstow Trust Account." Pl's Statement, ECF No. 39. Plaintiff stated, "I had been awaiting my retirement monies to pay such above stated charges and now . . . such monies . . . ha[ve] been sent to them for the above charges to be paid in full." Id.
On August 16, 2013, Defendant filed an Acknowledgment of Full Satisfaction of Judgment, stating that Plaintiff's payment to Defendant of $2,718.21 "fully satisfies the Order of July 18, 2013." Def's Acknowledgment, ECF No. 40.
The court hereby finds that costs were awarded to Defendant in the amount of $2,718.21 and that Plaintiff has paid those costs in satisfaction of judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
