Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Parker v. Hey, Inc., 3:16-CV-04884 WHA. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161115e07 Visitors: 37
Filed: Nov. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2016
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; PORPOSED ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . This stipulated request is made jointly by Plaintiff Jason Parker ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel. WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, on August 24, 2016 (the "Complaint") (Dkt. No. 1); W
More

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; PORPOSED ORDER

This stipulated request is made jointly by Plaintiff Jason Parker ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, on August 24, 2016 (the "Complaint") (Dkt. No. 1);

WHEREAS, on September 9, 2016, this case was reassigned to the Honorable William Alsup and all dates then scheduled were vacated (Dkt. No. 13);

WHEREAS, on October 5, 2016, the Clerk entered a Notice (Dkt. No. 23) setting the Case Management Conference for December 1, 2016 and providing that, not less than seven days prior, counsel shall submit a joint case management statement not to exceed ten pages;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Parties' September 24, 2016 stipulation extending Twitter's deadline to respond to the Complaint, Twitter filed its Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") (Dkt. No. 30) and its Request for Consideration of Documents Incorporated into Plaintiff's Complaint and, in the Alternative, for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 31) on November 2, 2016;

WHEREAS, Twitter noticed the hearing on its Motion to Dismiss for December 8, 2016;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's Opposition to Twitter's Motion to Dismiss is due on or before November 16, 2016, and Twitter's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss is due on or before November 23, 2016; and

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a seven-day continuance of the Case Management Conference, such that the Case Management Conference will fall on the same day as the hearing on Twitter's Motion to Dismiss, will permit more efficient case management, will serve the interests of judicial economy, and will conserve Party and Court resources;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the Parties make this stipulated request for an order providing the following:

1. The Case Management Conference is continued from December 1, 2016 to December 8, 2016 (the date on which Twitter's Motion to Dismiss is noticed for hearing). 2. Not less than seven days prior to the Case Management Conference, counsel shall submit a joint case management statement not to exceed ten pages.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer