U.S. v. LOMBARDI, CR 07-00006-01 SBA. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20121211b11
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE HEARING AND CONTINUE MATTER FOR STATUS HEARING ON JANUARY 29, 2013 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Defendant Tony D. Lombardi and the government, by and through undersigned counsel, jointly request that the Court vacate the hearing presently set before Court on December 12, 2012 and continue this matter to January 22, 2013. In support of this request, the parties stipulate as follows: 1. The matter is presently set for a revocation of supervised releas
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE HEARING AND CONTINUE MATTER FOR STATUS HEARING ON JANUARY 29, 2013 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Defendant Tony D. Lombardi and the government, by and through undersigned counsel, jointly request that the Court vacate the hearing presently set before Court on December 12, 2012 and continue this matter to January 22, 2013. In support of this request, the parties stipulate as follows: 1. The matter is presently set for a revocation of supervised release..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE HEARING AND CONTINUE MATTER FOR STATUS HEARING ON JANUARY 29, 2013
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Defendant Tony D. Lombardi and the government, by and through undersigned counsel, jointly request that the Court vacate the hearing presently set before Court on December 12, 2012 and continue this matter to January 22, 2013. In support of this request, the parties stipulate as follows:
1. The matter is presently set for a revocation of supervised release hearing before the Court on December 12, 2012.
2. Because one or more of the charges relate to facts that may give rise to additional federal criminal charges, the parties are presently discussing resolution of this matter in light of potential additional criminal charges.
3. The assigned prosecutor was not present when the December 12, 2012 hearing was set. This hearing conflicts with a pre-arranged, week-long training course.
4. After the week of December 17, 2012, defense counsel will not be available again until after January 11, 2012.
5. The assigned prosecutor has trial in another case set to begin on January 14, 2013 before the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton.
6. The parties have confirmed the assigned probation officer's availability for the proposed date.
For the reasons stated above, the parties respectfully request that the hearing presently set for December 12, 2012 be vacated and that this matter be continued to January 29, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
So stipulated.
ORDER
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS FOUND AND ORDERED THAT:
1. The currently scheduled hearing on December 12, 2012 is VACATED.
2. This matter is SET for a Revocation of Supervised Release hearing on January 29, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
Source: Leagle
