Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Estate of Hatfield v. County of Lake, 4:11-cv-02396 PJH. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140925976 Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between plaintiffs, ESTATE OF JIMMY RAY HATFIELD; R.H., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, WILLIAM TOWN; and K.H., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, WILLIAM TOWN; WILLIAM HATFIELD; and JUDY HATFIELD and defendants WILLIAM T. DURKIN, Jr., M.D. and WILLIAM T. DURKIN, Jr., M.D., INC. that the plaintiffs' above-cap
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between plaintiffs, ESTATE OF JIMMY RAY HATFIELD; R.H., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, WILLIAM TOWN; and K.H., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, WILLIAM TOWN; WILLIAM HATFIELD; and JUDY HATFIELD and defendants WILLIAM T. DURKIN, Jr., M.D. and WILLIAM T. DURKIN, Jr., M.D., INC. that the plaintiffs' above-captioned action is hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, as to WILLIAM T. DURKIN, Jr., M.D., WILLIAM T. DURKIN, Jr., M.D., INC., and to the entire action of all parties and all causes of action. Each party to bear their attorney fees and costs.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer