Macias v. Gen San Jose, LP, 19-cv-02355-NC. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200110817
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 08, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 22 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All sched
Summary: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 22 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All schedu..
More
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 22
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are VACATED.
The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
