Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cruz v. City of Rocklin, 2:17-cv-01628-MCE-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180108538 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PLAINTIFF, AND DEFENDANTS CITY OF ROCKLIN, CHRIS OSBORN, JOHN CONSTABLE, AND BREANNA ADAMS (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Parties"), that all documents produced in this case pursuant to Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., rules 26, 30, 34 & 45 shall be governed by this protective order. Absent a separate agreement between the Parties, in writing, al
More

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PLAINTIFF, AND DEFENDANTS CITY OF ROCKLIN, CHRIS OSBORN, JOHN CONSTABLE, AND BREANNA ADAMS (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Parties"), that all documents produced in this case pursuant to Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., rules 26, 30, 34 & 45 shall be governed by this protective order.

Absent a separate agreement between the Parties, in writing, all documents produced in this case shall be used by the Parties solely for the purpose of prosecuting and defending the above-captioned case. The documents shall not be duplicated, reproduced, transmitted, or communicated to any person for any reason other than counsel; clients; experts retained for the purpose of furthering the defense of or prosecution of the Plaintiff's case; deposition and trial witnesses; mediator or third party neutral; or the Court. The copying of produced documents is to be conducted in-house and shall not be done by outside third party vendors.

All copies of protected documents distributed by counsel to any Party for purpose of prosecuting or defending the litigation shall be returned to counsel at the conclusion of the litigation and counsel shall store and ultimately destroy the documents consistent with individual firm policy.

Nothing in this agreement shall be interpreted to limit Plaintiff's ability to obtain and disseminate documents procured outside this litigation, including, but not limited to, documents obtained pursuant to a request under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code § 6250 et. seq.).

This Order shall constitute a protective order pursuant to Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., rule 26(c) and shall be enforceable as set forth therein. The above is stipulated to by the respective counsel for the parties as follows:

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer