Von Magnus v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-CV-0474-DMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181120a50
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Pending before the court is defendant's motion for an extension of time to file an answering brief (Doc. 21). Pursuant to the court's October 1, 2018, order, defendant's brief was due by November 15, 2018. The current motion, filed on the date of the deadline and seeking a on
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Pending before the court is defendant's motion for an extension of time to file an answering brief (Doc. 21). Pursuant to the court's October 1, 2018, order, defendant's brief was due by November 15, 2018. The current motion, filed on the date of the deadline and seeking a one..
More
ORDER
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pending before the court is defendant's motion for an extension of time to file an answering brief (Doc. 21).
Pursuant to the court's October 1, 2018, order, defendant's brief was due by November 15, 2018. The current motion, filed on the date of the deadline and seeking a one-day extension of time, is not well-taken. The motion is denied without prejudice to defendant filing an answering brief accompanied by either a motion or stipulation to accept a late-filed brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
