Espinosa v. Certainteed Corporation, 4:18-cv-07059-HSG. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190116a52
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS TO EXTEND THE DUE DATE FOR RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants, and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ordered that the date for the parties' Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures is extended, and such disclosures shall be made 30 days after the Court issues its rulings on the pending motion to remand by Plaintiffs. PURSU
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS TO EXTEND THE DUE DATE FOR RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants, and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ordered that the date for the parties' Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures is extended, and such disclosures shall be made 30 days after the Court issues its rulings on the pending motion to remand by Plaintiffs. PURSUA..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS TO EXTEND THE DUE DATE FOR RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants, and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ordered that the date for the parties' Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures is extended, and such disclosures shall be made 30 days after the Court issues its rulings on the pending motion to remand by Plaintiffs.
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
