Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DeGuzman v. Crane Co., 17-cv-02228-PJH. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180130c55 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTIES AND AMEND COMPLAINT Re: Dkt. No. 271 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . Before the court is plaintiff Loida DeGuzman's motion to substitute parties filed on January 9, 2018. No opposition was filed and the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for February 14, 2018, is VACATED. Having read the papers and carefully considered the arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing,
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTIES AND AMEND COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 271

Before the court is plaintiff Loida DeGuzman's motion to substitute parties filed on January 9, 2018. No opposition was filed and the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for February 14, 2018, is VACATED. Having read the papers and carefully considered the arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS plaintiff's motion.

Original plaintiffs Jaime DeGuzman and his wife Loida DeGuzman alleged that Jaime DeGuzman's cancer was caused by his exposure to asbestos during his service as an electrician in the U.S. Navy. See Dkt. 35 ("Compl.").

On October 5, 2017, Mr. DeGuzman passed away. Dkt. 272. He is survived by his wife, plaintiff Loida DeGuzman, and his three adult children, Jastine Villanueva, Jason DeGuzman, and Jay DeGuzman. On October 12, 2017, a notice of suggestion of death was filed with the court. See Dkts. 259-260.

The parties stipulated to plaintiff Loida DeGuzman filing an amended complaint to include survival and wrongful death actions authorized by the California Code of Civil Procedure. Dkt. 270. The parties did not stipulate to the substitution of parties, see id, and plaintiff has not submitted a proposed amended complaint.

Plaintiff's unopposed motion to substitute parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a) is now before the court. The proposed substituted plaintiffs are Loida DeGuzman, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Jaime DeGuzman, and Jaime's DeGuzman's three children.

The court finds that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements of Rule 25(a) and hereby GRANTS plaintiff's motion to substitute parties and to amend the complaint.

As plaintiff has not submitted a proposed amended complaint for the court's review, other than the substitution of parties, the only amendments allowable are those referenced in the parties' January 9, 2018 stipulation. The amended complaint must be filed within 14 days of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer